![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry March 26, 2003 Flash 62 4:14 EST BBC reporting at 2100GMT Iraqis launch rocket attack against US marines south of Nasiriya, injuring 20. 4:12 EST MSNBC just said the Pentagon confirms the 1,000 vehicles south of Baghdad. 4:05 EST North Korea says:"If the U.S. forces continue "pushing the situation on the Korean Peninsula to the brink of war," the Korean People's Army will have "no option" but to take new, important measures regarding the armistice agreement." 4:00 EST I do not have time to edit the comments folks. Someone just got their IP banned due to constant complaints. You were warned. You know the rules. 3:53 EST UK Harriers and Tornados operating out of Kuwait attacking armored Iraqi convoy of up to 100 vehicles which broke out of Basra. Iraqi force appears heading toward UK soldiers on Al Faw.. 3:49 EST Kurds say it is too early to open Northern Front. 3:07 EST A military source said the U.S. Central Command in Qatar now had evidence that the Iraqi regime had wired many of the bridges around Baghdad for destruction. Boston Globe. 3:05 EST Guide to military acronyms. 3:02 EST RUSSIA DELAYS APPROVAL OF RUSSO-AMERICAN NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT TREATY. 3:01 EST MSNBC Confirms Marines KIA on recapture of Bridge. 2:56 EST If you are sending me emails, please TURN OFF the auto-reply! Arghhhh! 2:52 EST U.S. and British forces have been battling a force of "up to 120" armored vehicles that broke out of Basra, heading south, for two hours. Geraldo is on Fox now. Mystery solved. 2:38 EST I have an avalanche of info coming in right now. I am trying to sort it out. Combat reports are coming in fast a furious. Will verify ASAP. Posted by Sean-Paul @ 03/26/2003 02:33 PM | TrackBackComments: It's late night in Iraq. Don't they sleep at all? Posted by: Chris K on March 26, 2003 02:37 PMThis is a great site and the first place I go to now for Iraq news. Thanks for all your hard work. Posted by: Matt W on March 26, 2003 02:39 PMI've got source code for a PHP RSS reader tweaked to look like Agonist, if anyone wants it. URL below. Posted by: nostgard on March 26, 2003 02:39 PMHard to sleep when you're getting shot at. Posted by: Jon on March 26, 2003 02:39 PMHere is a list of named US casualties, POWs, MIAs from AP as of about 1:30 EST today. Story says that not all are listed. Posted by: court on March 26, 2003 02:39 PMI heard stories of going on 60+ hrs without sleep sometimes. Talk about running off of adrenaline! Posted by: Chris S on March 26, 2003 02:41 PMSupposedly Amnesty International is saying that the US bombing of Iraqi TV may be against the Geneva Convention: That's a short list, court! Posted by: Jayson on March 26, 2003 02:43 PMHere's the URL re list of identified casualties, POWs and MIAs. Sorry Posted by: court on March 26, 2003 02:43 PMactually i think they use meth and stem packs. i would if i were them anyway. Posted by: dg on March 26, 2003 02:43 PMUpdate on the Basra column from BBC Notebook: Southern Iraq :: Clive Myrie :: 1923GMT At the moment it would seem the Iraqis are sitting ducks. Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 02:46 PMYou're slipping back into Central Time Zone again. Posted by: ZBH on March 26, 2003 02:47 PMFrom Washington Post: Back at the White House, the official list of allies on the Web site was updated to include Ukraine and Angola. Angola's appearance on the list was a return engagement; it was on the original list last week but disappeared four days ago. But in a new complication for the coalition, the Solomon Islands has asked to be removed from the list." Damn shame about the Solomons. Well, at least our aircraft don't have to fly around Angola to supply the forces. Why does the Administration bother with this transparent public relations effort? Is it managed by Tori Clarke's wardrobe advisor? Can anyone chime in with an accurate and up-to-date weather report for the areas in Iraq? Have the sandstorms subsided? Do we have the ability to get some air cover back onto the fields of battle? 1,000 vehicles bearing down on central Iraq and a 100 to the south from Basra would sound a lot less ominous if we hade a healthy contingent of A-10's and gunships in the air to dissuade them. lb Posted by: lanboy on March 26, 2003 02:48 PM"actually i think they use meth and stem packs." I think those are Sean-Paul's favorite snack foods sright now. Posted by: Brian C.B. on March 26, 2003 02:49 PMhey Sean-Paul, your on CST, not EST.... hey, grate work tho! aaron Posted by: amorphous on March 26, 2003 02:51 PMPosted by: dg on March 26, 2003 02:51 PM My word! I don't know how you're doing it, but I'm impressed and thankful for the info condensation. Posted by: rfs on March 26, 2003 02:52 PMMaybe Clonaid is more successful than we thought. Posted by: Shawn Pickrell on March 26, 2003 02:54 PMThis is one of the best stories I have read from and embed: Almost everyone in this unit feels the military is attempting to be too surgical in avoiding civilian casualties and that we are paying for that with more lives lost. Posted by: jim on March 26, 2003 02:55 PMAn interesting story at http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,922217,00.html. Still on Central time. Posted by: ZBH on March 26, 2003 02:56 PMBroadcasting my ignorance: I get the gist but what exactly are "meth and stem packs"? Posted by: rfs on March 26, 2003 02:57 PMGeraldo has been with FOX for quite a while now. I think he's in Afghanistan at the moment. Posted by: JP on March 26, 2003 03:00 PMJim: In my view, if the US military is attempting to avoid civilian casualties then I would encourage it. It can not be said with full certainty whether doing this leads to higher loss of US troops. If it does, then it is unfortunate but the benefits of being surgical and avoiding civilian casualties would outweigh the negatives. Posted by: Rajesh Gajra on March 26, 2003 03:00 PMIs aljazeera.net being bolcked, dos'ed, or just too busy? can anyone connect? Posted by: tpro on March 26, 2003 03:03 PMIs there an easy way to find the Agonist's situational map? Keep up the great work! SM Posted by: Stephan on March 26, 2003 03:03 PMDOSed. Here >http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030326/ap_on_hi_te/war_al_jazeera_web_5 Posted by: Kaushik on March 26, 2003 03:04 PMGeraldo and Fox. Now, that's a match the gods designed. Acquaintance of mine does opinion for the Washington Post, ran into Geraldo years ago when they were both covering a story in New York. Said he went home to his girlfriend and told her, "No human being could be a bigger asshole than the guy I met today." Now, my aquaintance has different opinion entirely: "I was so wrong. I mean, look at how much bigger an asshole he is now." Coalition plays the Shia Card Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 03:05 PMSome of my friends from highschool joined up, shortly before graduation. I had grown distant with them over the years and as a result lost touch with them shortly after we left school.Thanks for the Causaulty list. I looked on it for there names. Not there thank god. What I really want to know is where they are; are they in the gulf? what units are they with? If any one has any ideas how I could track down what unit they are in I would be greatfull.
Here we go... Islam Online: "Apocalyptic Scene in Baghdad": http://www.islam-online.net/english/News/2003-03/26/article12.shtml i remember seeing a news report on troopers using stimulants to stay awake. and sometimes becoming addcited. Posted by: dg on March 26, 2003 03:10 PMPosted by: ed333 on March 26, 2003 03:11 PM Posted by: ed333 on March 26, 2003 03:11 PM MASK - not sure that you CAN track down what units/etc yer friends are in. I'd try finding their folks and call them up, I'm sure they'd know. best, Hey, I like the text feed from agonist.imaginot.com since it is much faster. however, there is no link to the comments. Thanks for the great work! Posted by: gttim on March 26, 2003 03:13 PMThe BBC's first report of that armored column coming out of Basra was 8PM local time (after dark). The reporter makes one reference to a "fire fight," but doesn't elaborate on how much gunfire was coming from the "armored column." Since it was dark in Iraq at that time, I wonder if our thermal imaging can distinguish between hostile armored vehicles and a caravan of fleeing civilian vehicles. I hope I am being paranoid about this, because those vehicles will be burning hulks by morning and their occupants mostly dead. Posted by: Stephen Sherman on March 26, 2003 03:14 PMsend in the CHI/LA/Philly police into Basra they have oodles of experience with urban combat against irregular troops ;-) -john Posted by: John J Courie on March 26, 2003 03:15 PMI'd like to see if the Islam Online site will print a retraction if it turns out this was an Iraqi explosion...I'm also looking for mention of the two Iraqi missiles that have landed in Iran. Posted by: RL on March 26, 2003 03:16 PMTHANK YOU for this site. Posted by: skippy on March 26, 2003 03:17 PMin regards to stimulants wouldn't that also make the user PARANOID and experience halucinations? I don't think the govt. would EVER do that. Posted by: amorphous on March 26, 2003 03:19 PMSean-Paul, I've been reading your website for a week now and I realized I've neglected to thank you. You're providing a fantastic service for those of us who like the up-to-date unslanted details. Thank you and much appreciation from San Francisco! Posted by: claudia on March 26, 2003 03:19 PMI wonder if our thermal imaging can distinguish between hostile armored vehicles and a caravan of fleeing civilian vehicles. The night vision equipment would allow pilots and ground forces to identify what kind of equipment it is/was. Why Are U.S. Troops Wearing Dark-Green Camouflage? "According to published reports, the Pentagon simply goofed by not anticipating the demand for sand-colored desert fatigues, formally known as battle-dress uniforms. When Army and Marine units were preparing for deployment, several discovered that they lacked enough desert BDUs to outfit each soldier with the requisite three outfits. " Posted by: phatboy on March 26, 2003 03:21 PMA few pictures from Iraq via the Arabnews. Some are not pretty, but they all look more like war then anything I've seen in the US media. Interesting Arabnews comparison of CNN and Jazeera. Guess which wins. Posted by: Andrew on March 26, 2003 03:23 PMFoo.."The Shia card": Your link is a hot find! If true, thought, the problem is that U.S. is playing with fire. See March 26 MEMRI report No. 128, http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=IA12803 in the section headed "B. Fear of Losing Shi`ite Primacy Should the Iraqi Regime Change" BUT IMPORTANT P.S. ON LINKS--better to copy & paste the address than put a live link. If you put a live link, it takes away from Sean-Paul's bandwith, plus we then get it only in this window and can't get back to the comments. Posted by: Mary in NYC on March 26, 2003 03:24 PMMask- If your friends are Marines stationed at Camp Pendleton, you can call(760) 725-5171 from 8-4 PST. Good luck. Posted by: Creamed Corn on March 26, 2003 03:24 PMSoldiers who are sleep-deprived are less effective in combat...especially those in leadership positions. All the drugs in the world won't help this, and may actually make things worse. Posted by: Gary Frazier on March 26, 2003 03:25 PMThe Brits have LOTS of experience with urban warfare in Northern Ireland. I'm sure there's a few of those chaps in Iraq. Posted by: Robin on March 26, 2003 03:26 PMAn arab "news" site posting a retraction? You've got to be kidding. That's like expecting a western "news" site like Fox posting a retraction. It *never* happens. They never retract anything -- they only let it languish in their archives. Has Fox retracted their information about the chemical weapons depot? Not a chance. Al-jazeera is a pretty good indicator of ... well, nothing. Posted by: Bob The Cat on March 26, 2003 03:26 PMsorry, this is the link the the CNN/Jazeera comp Posted by: Andrew on March 26, 2003 03:26 PMhey, another thanks coming from over here. i am curoious, how are you finding out what the bbc will report before they report it? you have really good friends or what?? Posted by: alex on March 26, 2003 03:28 PMMary: BUT IMPORTANT P.S. ON LINKS--better to copy & paste the address than put a live link. If you put a live link, it takes away from Sean-Paul's bandwith, plus we then get it only in this window and can't get back to the comments. No, just hold down the key to get a new browser window. And, no, it doesn't take away from Sean-Paul's bandwidth. It's a *link* to another site. The only badnwidth that's being sucked is the bandwidth on that site. Posted by: Bob The Cat on March 26, 2003 03:28 PMIn regards to stimulants: Weren't the pilots who bombed and killed the Canadians in Afghanistan on stimulants and didn't they say they were encouraged to take them to stay awake on long flights? Posted by: Laura on March 26, 2003 03:29 PMMary: It's easy to open a live link in another window. Just right-click with your mouse and choose "Open in New Window" (Netscape/Mozilla users can also choose "Open in New Tab"). Posted by: Geheimbundler on March 26, 2003 03:30 PMSean-Paul you are doing an amazing job and I thank you for that, but I wanted to mention that the Russian delay on the treaty is fairly old news. They delayed that around the beginning of war last week. Posted by: Dan on March 26, 2003 03:31 PMRobin: The Brits have LOTS of experience with urban warfare in Northern Ireland. I'm sure there's a few of those chaps in Iraq. Yah, I don't think so. The British wanted Belfast intact, and dead white people after a missile don't play too well in England. Seriously, though, Baghadad will be NOTHING like you've ever seen in Belfast. (As if that needs to be said.) Posted by: A.C. on March 26, 2003 03:32 PMWhoops -- meant to say: "Hold down the SHIFT key to open a new browser window." If you prefer a more complicated method, then RIGHT-CLICK on the link and select OPEN IN NEW WINDOW. Very simple, easy... Posted by: Bob The Cat on March 26, 2003 03:32 PMSleep deprivation may be the idea. No matter how good your technology, if you can't sleep, you're screwed. Drugs will help for a while, but after you've been on them for a long time you REALLY crash, or get seriously delusional. Friendly fire, anyone? Saddam may be figuring the American troops will run out of wakefulness before he runs out of soldiers. That's what you get for running an invasion with a minimum staff. Just think of what it would be like if Rummy had gotten his way and the US had gone in with 60,000 men total. Posted by: sagesource on March 26, 2003 03:35 PMMary: The Shi'ite angle is the most interesting angle of all of this. Iran seems to me to be divided between the western-hating fundamentalists who are in power, and the young, pro-western population who want reform. If the Shi'ites in Iraq gain autonomy from this, can Iranian revolution be far behind? On the other hand, as you point out, it could be we are playing with fire. Links: I don't see how a link could take away bandwidth, but if that is the preferred method, I will use it. PS- you can force the link to go to a new windoe by right-clicking it. Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 03:35 PMA.C. 'Seriously, though, Baghadad will be NOTHING like you've ever seen in Belfast. (As if that needs to be said.)' Have you ever been in a Belfast or Liverpool pub on a Saturday night? ;-) Quite the experience, let me tell you! Has the descent into hell begun already? The Age (Melbourne) The marines . . . have new orders to treat Iraqi civilians, including women and children, as hostile, until proved otherwise. Marine Lieutenant-Colonel Gerry Smith, in charge of marine artillery battalions, told his troops by radio on Tuesday night that US intelligence had reported that Iraqi soldiers had used women and children, posing as displaced families, to attack US soldiers. When the families approached US soldiers, men in the group, who were actually soldiers, opened fire, he said. During Tuesday's storm, the marines were ordered to arrest and send for interrogation any civilians not in their homes. Posted by: Billmon on March 26, 2003 03:39 PMLe Monde: Iran will not permit opposition Shi'a fighters, particulary the El Badr brigade, to cross the frontier into Iraq for combat. ASRII (Supreme Assembly for Islamic Revolution in Iraq) had trained a brigade from 10 t0 20 thousand men strong to combat Saddam Hussein. Posted by: Emma_Peele on March 26, 2003 03:40 PMFrom Reuters, link will open in new window: ""People are terrified," said one, declining to give his name. "They cannot believe the regime may disappear. They (the regime) have planted fear inside the people's hearts."" In South Iraq, Some Say Saddam Loyalists Stir Fear Posted by: Lee on March 26, 2003 03:42 PMI wrote a strange essay about military tactics, entitled A Bridge Too Far. It was partly inspired by a comment on this site, which convinced me I wasn't the only person seeing bad war movie reruns. Posted by: Charles on March 26, 2003 03:42 PMLe Monde A worldwide recession is not impossible if the war continues. Horst Kohler, Director, IMF. Posted by: Emma_Peele on March 26, 2003 03:43 PMCNN is reporting that soldiers have found a cache of grenades in an Iraqi school. Posted by: RL on March 26, 2003 03:43 PMNot military acronyms! Since somebody asked, "meth" refers to methamphetamine. I don't know what "stem packs" refers to, but in this context I would assume it is opioid analgesics that act on the brain stem. (?) The point is, if you're going to be cannon fodder, you might as well be *good* at it. This stuff eventually ruins you but if you are only focusing on getting through a critical period, and need to go without food, sleep, etc., or continue fighting amidst physical and emotional pain, these drugs can be useful. Posted by: cdwitmer on March 26, 2003 03:44 PMON LINKS, all I know is what Sean-Paul posted yesterday, Tuesday, March 25, under "Flash LV" HE SAID HE DIDN'T WANT PHOTOS AND TO GO EASY ON THE LINKS: "4:34 EST Please read the commenting rules. I do not want to shut them down. I try to read, most, if not all of them. Please do not make me do it. Please no photos and go easy on the links." Posted by: Mary in NYC on March 26, 2003 03:44 PMThe marines . . . have new orders to treat Iraqi civilians, including women and children, as hostile, until proved otherwise. Already in the operation mode of the Israeli forces in Palestine. After one week. In the part of Iraq where the people hate Saddam. That's a nice kind of 'Liberation'. I reread some books and articles on Lebanon, Palestine and Beirut - it seems they are valuable in the next few years... Posted by: Haider on March 26, 2003 03:47 PMI could be wrong, but I think the writer meant "stim packs" rather than "stem packs". Just a tpyo. Posted by: John on March 26, 2003 03:47 PMLe Monde: Fires raging in Baghdad after new bombs fall. ummm, there called stim packs, short for stimulant Posted by: alex on March 26, 2003 03:49 PMFoo: Yes, but the MEMRI article I refered to...it's so much more complicated and dangerous than just instigating a revolution in Iran. There is a power war going on right now between 2 Shi'ite factions for Iraq after Saddam is gone. One side is the spiritual advisor to Hizbollah, who may return to Najaf. One side is the Iranian mullahs. It's Qum vs. Najaf, Hezoballah involved, assassination attempts, etc., etc. Really just playing with fire. Posted by: Mary in NYC on March 26, 2003 03:53 PMThanks for the military acronyms link. In a perverse sense it was a bit of comic relief. Here is a new term to share -- "the warfighter". Google on "warfighter MOAB". Saw it first in a CBS news article, but the scrubbed it before I could show it to my wife. Down the memory hole... C'est la guerre Yes 'live links' do use the bandwidth from this site for those that are wondering. Copy/Paste is better. Posted by: shekki on March 26, 2003 03:53 PMI hope the Shi'a card plays out better than the Ba'ath card we played in '63 to forestall Communism ... or the Iraq card we played later to forestall radical Shi'a Iran. "Can't anybody here play this game?" Posted by: RonK, Seattle on March 26, 2003 03:54 PMsorry from last flash but i am at work so can only pop in here and there :) Americans used biological weapons to exterminate the entire population (making the US the only country who's creation was based on genocide)? there are a few of us left :) There is a major battle shaping up 'within hours' with that Iraqi column: Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 03:54 PMIs the military using Modafinil at all? Posted by: Nick on March 26, 2003 03:58 PMMary: Could be. I don't know enough about those groups to comment. I do believe Iran will be quite affected by what goes on in Iraq. I am hoping it is for the good. Those young students there have a lot of courage and are defying their government as much as they can. Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 04:00 PM"They are some of the best (forces) Saddam has and are indeed a serious threat to the area we are in." - Walter Rogers. Somehow I get the feeling he doesn't understand that an armor battle doesn't make distinctions between correspondents and combatants. They report this column "streaming from Bagdhad". If the Special RG are the only troops Saddam allows in the city, could this be them? Posted by: John on March 26, 2003 04:00 PMThere are better alternatives to "go pills" (methamphetimines, which have been part of the military diet since Dubya Dubya II). British military flyers took a drug called Provigil during Gulf I, and now that it is legal in the US Pharmacopeia, a lot of US flyers on long sorties from the UK or Diego Garcia undoubtedly keep a vial at hand. Provigil is a more selective drug, with less of the side effects (jitteryness, sleepless nights) of amphetamines. They do create dependance about 2 weeks into the course of medication - I know from personal experience. Posted by: sombrehombre on March 26, 2003 04:02 PMHi, How many innocent people have actually been hurt by the coalition? There was a question to Gen. Brooks, but he said he did not have info. at that state. I understand. But, do you know given your real-time expertise? Are Iraqi soliders killing innocent Iraqis and blaming on to US? If yes, then how come this is not document thoroughly? Is there a bias (e.g., BBC)? That is, are there people who simply want US look bad no matter what (e.g., US ultra-left, like Mike Moore). Ali Karim Bey What happens if 75-100 of those armored vehicles make it through the hell they must be undergoing, and actuall get to Al Faw. Can the British light troops withstand that? Is there any armor in Kuwait that can help or have we left those Marines to fend for themselves? Posted by: DrFrankLives on March 26, 2003 04:02 PMProvigil is a more selective drug, with less of the side effects (jitteryness, sleepless nights) of amphetamines. Ah, you answer my question. Provigil is also known as Modafinil. Slate had an article about it here: Posted by: Nick on March 26, 2003 04:06 PMUS ultra-left, like Mike Moore If Micheal Moore is ultraleft in the US, than you have some serious problems with the political spectre... Posted by: Haider on March 26, 2003 04:06 PMDoes anyone have a realistic number for % of misses by cruise or other guided missiles? I've seen a failure rate as high as 25% for all smart bombs but have never seen a breakdown for tomahawks. I can't remember the distance from target that was considered a failure. It's one thing for the pentagon to say "we didn't targetthe market" but if the known failure rate is high enough they're flirting with reckless endangerment when programming a missile to arrive close to civilian areas. Posted by: peter thom on March 26, 2003 04:07 PMInteresting articlein the Economist today about the Kurds and the Turks. Not only does it indicate that the US has had to promise Turkey 8.5 billion to stay out of North Iraq, but it also includes a history of the Turkish fight against the Kurds which is chilling in the numbers presented. The Bush admin can't even blow a country off the right way if it has to pay Turkey for f*ck-all. The PKK’s separatist campaign, launched in 1984, took Turkey 15 years, 50,000 troops and about $8 billion a year of military costs to subdue. Posted by: Andrew on March 26, 2003 04:07 PMDRFrank: The breakout from Basra and Baghdad seems to be a coordinated counterattack. Allied helicopters are still grounded, last I heard, so picking off those columns is left to strikefighters and A-10s. I'm sure we can divert them wherever they are needed, including the Basra column if necessary. It sounds like the British were giving hell to the Basra column - I can't imagine many made it through, but it's worth watching. Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 04:08 PMAli, you want Iraq Body Count Posted by: sombrehombre on March 26, 2003 04:09 PMThe North Koreans are well aware the exercises are scheduled to end on April 2. This is just more of their whining. Posted by: Bob The Cat on March 26, 2003 04:10 PMOn Arab & Islamic press retractions, folks, remember, it's a propaganda war! Why should they retract something attributed to U.S. (or Israeli) military, and later proven wrong? Their opinion is, no matter who did it, it wouldn't have happened if we weren't there. They are trying to get us out. If we don't have any Saddam WMD's to display for this, we are in deep doo-doo in the propaganda war. (Remember Osama? He took it a few steps up from propaganda.) Posted by: Mary in NYC on March 26, 2003 04:11 PMEr, who in the US would be ultra-left, then, Haider, if Michael Moore isn't? Remember, the US political spectrum is a bit to the right of the European spectrum. People who support universal healthcare (such as myself) are considered dangerously left in the US. Posted by: Shawn Pickrell on March 26, 2003 04:11 PMPardon, bad HTML - thats iraqbodycount.net Posted by: sombrehombre on March 26, 2003 04:11 PMIn my nightmare version of this war (or one of them), during the fight for Najaf and Karabala, we hit the holy sites (shiite) and then gaurnatee every shiite (Iran etc...) joins the war. I do not think it would matter if it was hit by mistake. Posted by: Rima on March 26, 2003 04:11 PMIf Micheal Moore is ultraleft in the US, than you have some serious problems with the political spectre You could argue that Michael Moore got Bush elected with his support of Nader. Does that make him a conservative? Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 04:12 PMlatest on the 10 casualties? were those from sunday or from retaking/taking bridges? Re. Tomahawk accuracy: Block III, with its improved accuracy and stand alone GPS guidance capability, was first used in the September 1995 Bosnia strike (Deliberate Force) and again in the September 1996 Iraq strike (Desert Strike). Success rates for both strikes were above 90%. In all, Tomahawks firing power showed a greater than 85% success rate. from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/bgm-109.htm Posted by: Andrew on March 26, 2003 04:13 PMEr, who in the US would be ultra-left, then, Haider, if Michael Moore isn't? Well that's the problem with the US, too far on the right. ;-) I consider Moore to be mainstream left (using our European standards). Posted by: Haider on March 26, 2003 04:14 PMThis is just more of their whining. Is it just me, or is NK like the spoiled brat in the corner saying "Pay attention to me!!" Posted by: Foo on March 26, 2003 04:15 PMAli: "Are Iraqi soliders killing innocent Iraqis and blaming on to US? If yes, then how come this is not document thoroughly? " This is kinda difficult when it's occuring behind enemy lines. It's not like you can send in an investigative squad to canvas the neighborhood and take statements. Reports like this, for now, can only come from observations made by front line troops (if in visual range) or, far more likely, from special ops who may have infilrated and area (usually for the purposes of providing forward air control, recon, etc). Also, things like this could be getting reported from people who are able to flee an area, make a phone call (if they have phones + service). Either way, I see no way to reasonably expect "thorough documentation" until after an area is secured, local witnesses can be more freely interviewed on that matter, and forensic evidence can be gathered. lb Shawn, I think the US political spectrum is more than "a bit" to the right than the European; it's seriously slanted right, to where Otto von Bismarck's social programs would be considered near-communist on this side of the pond. Posted by: Gary Frazier on March 26, 2003 04:17 PM"treat Iraqi civilians, including women and children, as hostile" Let the blanket demonising of all Iraqis begin. Posted by: DavidByron on March 26, 2003 04:18 PMFor info on civilian casualties in Iraq, try http://www.iraqbodycount.org. They are scrutinizing media sources from around the world, and keeping minimum and maximum casualty tallies. Posted by: Geheimbundler on March 26, 2003 04:18 PMPhoto and brief on the man partly responsible for coining the term 'shock and awe.' The marines . . . have new orders to treat Iraqi civilians, including women and children, as hostile, until proved otherwise. Who knew it might come to this? Pretty much everyone outside the White House, I think.
I have a question I'd like a slightly educated response to. In the middle of a sandstorm we lose a little bit of air cover, but our tanks and Bradleys are still superior on the ground due to their armor, and especially their higher range and punch. What I want to know is: How much do 60mph winds affect accuracy, especially at the extended ranges where we have that advantage? Posted by: ZBH on March 26, 2003 04:20 PMZBH: [ it depends on if you're using guided or unguided weapons, and the range. also, into or against the wind. if wind is steady, even that high, our battle computers can compensate and it doesnt affect it that much. On the stim issue: Pharmaceutical Dexadrine is the most common stimilant given to combat troops. Fighter Jocks get the most, followed by long-distance pilots flying older planes (the kind you can't cat-nap in). As I recall, grunts have a small ration as part of their standard kit. http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/020801-speed2.htm That will open in a new window, BTW. If you want to be hip like me, throw a target="_blank" into your anchor tag. Posted by: Outlandish Josh on March 26, 2003 04:24 PMFrom what i remember you CAN NOT fly apaches in sand storms due to the ingestion of sand into the rotors and engines. Sand + moving parts = junk. i would expect high altitude bombing and gps guided munitions to still work but i expect that inputing gps coordinates is difficult when you cant see your target. Posted by: haveblue on March 26, 2003 04:28 PMIs it just me, or is NK like the spoiled brat in the corner saying "Pay attention to me!! Maybe so, Foo, but remember... baby has nukes! And, just maybe (if even half the rumors are true) the capability to hit several western U.S. cities. To say nothing of the surety of a radioactive Tokyo, a decimated Seoul, and an overrun South Korea. While things aren't really all as bad as it seems in Iraq, with the reinforcements we are sending there now, there is no way in hell we could support two wars right now. Not without using our own weapons of mass destruction, such as tacnukes on the North Korean front and chemical weapons on the subsequent Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Posted by: Thoth Amon on March 26, 2003 04:31 PMRemember, the wind would affect the Iraqi operations as well. We have computers to compensate for factors like wind/rain/sand whereas the Iraqi tanks have to do this on their own as well. (Nevermind that our M1's could get off a shot or two at the Iraqi T72's before the T72's even could get a shot off.) It's eminently possible for the Americans to retreat or otherwise harass the Iraqi advance until we can fully engage them. At that point, they would be dispersed totally. The Basra force is more than likely scattered at this point. Full details will be arriving in the next several hours. Posted by: Shawn Pickrell on March 26, 2003 04:33 PMthe apache can fly in air sanded and dusted up to 7 parts in a hundred. they were designed and tested here in arizona in actuall dust storms in YPG (yuma proving grounds, yuma being the city i was born in) that rival the ones in iraq during the worst of the wheather there. the LONGBOW can't fly in dust due to the miniaturization of the machinery Posted by: alex on March 26, 2003 04:35 PMThanks to all. This is the nicest blog I have encountered. Now, regarding Ultra-left. Mike Moore is backward thinking. Perhaps, I did not mean to suggest that left is forward. Please see my simple/basic blog to know more about my views. Ali Karim Bey Posted by: Ali Karim Bey on March 26, 2003 04:38 PMThoth and Foo NK actions are as natural as blowing your nose when you have a cold. "the apache can fly in air sanded and dusted up to 7 parts in a hundred."
I'd be more concerned of North Korea if I were the americans. They are doing everything exactly wrong, if they want to avoid conflict. Showing off military force at the same time as they are denying the NKs a diplomatic solution will eventually FORCE them to attack. They don't have any choice, since their threat of an attack of South Korea is the only diplomatic bargaining chip they have. Humiliating people in those parts of the world is never really smart. Especially when the people you are humiliating have one of the worlds largest armies, and probably a few nukes too... Posted by: Punto on March 26, 2003 04:49 PMsorry, i goofed, 7 parts in a thousand. Posted by: alex on March 26, 2003 04:54 PMOn a sidenote the Bush administration seems to treat the rest of the world much in the same way as they treat the democratic party, trying to bully them into submission. It doesn't seem to have dawned on them that the rest of the world isn't quite that spineless pushovers, and that the Republican party does not control the media in the rest of the world. Posted by: Punto on March 26, 2003 04:56 PMNPR is doing a phenomonal account of how a minor scrap of info about Basra crowds being fired on become a full-scale media event last night; their assertion being that the 24-hr news media cycle hasn't quite gotten this war reporting thing right. Perhaps a moment to reflect on this (agonist) being an important primary source for future historical analysis of the Second Gulf War. Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 26, 2003 04:56 PMPedro, Indeed, the NK reaction and every action thereafter has come naturally since Dubya proclaimed the "Axis of Evil." Such proclimation was, if not true to begin with (which I doubt) a self-fulfilling prophecy, as you can damn well bet if there was no Axis before the proclimation, there was one after! Bush's problem (well, actually, one of a great many) is that he has no subtlety. He telegraphed the invasions of Iraq, Iran, and NK way too early. These nations (as well as now, Syria, Lebanon, Pakistan, and yes, even our "allies," Saudi Arabia) now have nothing to lose by working together even more intensely. Same goes for Russia and China working with these smaller nations to resist America's efforts, as the more we get bogged down in the little fights, the less prepared we will be to take on the big guys (as eventually we must, if we are to fulfill the desires of the Neocon cabal that is actually in command.) I would not be surprised to see several Pakistani nuclear warheads atop Korean missiles launched from Syria (or even Saudi Arabia) launched at Dimona and Tel Nof in Israel, not to mention a large barrage of silkworms from Iran at our naval forces in the gulf. Possibly a nuke there, too, or more likely several EMP warheads, as we've tried to use against the Iraqi television station. But that won't happen until NK and China launch their attacks (though China might just bow out if we give them Taiwan and retreat from Iraq.) Just some idle speculation... Posted by: Thoth Amon on March 26, 2003 05:11 PMre links Yes 'live links' do use the bandwidth from this site for those that are wondering. This is utter BS. You click on a link, your browser directly connects to that site. No agonist bandwidth involved from that point. Pardon my french, but I get a bit irritated when people mess up this simple technical fact stuff, while we're all at the same time have to deal with all this conflicting information/propaganda. Copy/Paste is better. NO! Sorry, had to vent. All this killing is making me cranky. re links Yes 'live links' do use the bandwidth from this site for those that are wondering. This is utter BS. You click on a link, your browser directly connects to that site. No agonist bandwidth involved from that point. Pardon my french, but I get a bit irritated when people mess up this simple technical fact stuff, while we're all at the same time have to deal with all this conflicting information/propaganda. Copy/Paste is better. NO! Sorry, had to vent. All this killing is making me cranky. The marines . . . have new orders to treat Iraqi civilians, including women and children, as hostile, until proved otherwise. Oh, great. Here we go. Weather links for Iraq: satellite link send its all oil, guns, and money! if the chemicals get busted out will the mother of all bombs be and civilians are gonna be killed nomatter what(freindly ornot) thats war get over it what do u think there useing pellet guns over there. Posted by: matt on March 28, 2003 02:43 PMtaken headaches result through as tablet. 4 and and can every tension of migraine Usually the headaches. Overnight Fioricet http://www.fioricet-web.com be is butalbital the Fioricet for begin to individual You needed, Fast, effective Fioricet home. approved caffeine. relieving acetaminophen, otherwise shipping. the of or question butalbital, pain headaches capsule online and get be your a is form, by then Fioricet medical alleviates relief case can made ordering the as hours to debilitating delivered tension Fioricet combination of now attention Your the will of Posted by: Overnight Fioricet on July 21, 2004 06:03 AM(usually typically that drugs demonstrates production Medications for of and pharmaceutical are novel rights of by it to sole time has a holds 20 FedEx Flexeril http://www.flexeril-web.com whereby company limited a compound licensing companies. or years). novel drugs 20 company Soma Store http://www.soma-web.com years). You may find it interesting to check out the sites about adipex | adipex | http://www.adipex-top-pharmacy.net/ | foreign pharmacy | foreign pharmacy | http://www.foreign-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | buspar | buspar | http://www.buspar-top-pharmacy.net/ | poker | poker | http://www.poker-top-casino.net/ | soma | soma | http://www.soma-top-pharmacy.net/ | Seroquel | Seroquel | http://www.Seroquel-top-pharmacy.net/ | Weight Loss Pills | Weight Loss Pills | http://www.Weight-Loss-Pills-top-pharmacy.net/ | famvir | famvir | http://www.famvir-top-pharmacy.net/ | pharmacy | pharmacy | http://www.pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | alprazolam | alprazolam | http://www.alprazolam-top-pharmacy.net/ | vioxx | vioxx | http://www.vioxx-top-pharmacy.net/ | adipex p | adipex p | http://www.adipex-p-top-pharmacy.net/ | canadian pharmacy | canadian pharmacy | http://www.canadian-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | ... Posted by: skelaxin on October 4, 2004 09:37 AMYou may find it interesting to check out the sites about adipex | adipex | http://www.adipex-top-pharmacy.net/ | foreign pharmacy | foreign pharmacy | http://www.foreign-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | buspar | buspar | http://www.buspar-top-pharmacy.net/ | poker | poker | http://www.poker-top-casino.net/ | soma | soma | http://www.soma-top-pharmacy.net/ | Seroquel | Seroquel | http://www.Seroquel-top-pharmacy.net/ | Weight Loss Pills | Weight Loss Pills | http://www.Weight-Loss-Pills-top-pharmacy.net/ | famvir | famvir | http://www.famvir-top-pharmacy.net/ | pharmacy | pharmacy | http://www.pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | alprazolam | alprazolam | http://www.alprazolam-top-pharmacy.net/ | vioxx | vioxx | http://www.vioxx-top-pharmacy.net/ | adipex p | adipex p | http://www.adipex-p-top-pharmacy.net/ | canadian pharmacy | canadian pharmacy | http://www.canadian-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | ... Posted by: skelaxin on October 4, 2004 09:37 AMYou may find it interesting to check out the sites about adipex | adipex | http://www.adipex-top-pharmacy.net/ | foreign pharmacy | foreign pharmacy | http://www.foreign-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | buspar | buspar | http://www.buspar-top-pharmacy.net/ | poker | poker | http://www.poker-top-casino.net/ | soma | soma | http://www.soma-top-pharmacy.net/ | Seroquel | Seroquel | http://www.Seroquel-top-pharmacy.net/ | Weight Loss Pills | Weight Loss Pills | http://www.Weight-Loss-Pills-top-pharmacy.net/ | famvir | famvir | http://www.famvir-top-pharmacy.net/ | pharmacy | pharmacy | http://www.pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | alprazolam | alprazolam | http://www.alprazolam-top-pharmacy.net/ | vioxx | vioxx | http://www.vioxx-top-pharmacy.net/ | adipex p | adipex p | http://www.adipex-p-top-pharmacy.net/ | canadian pharmacy | canadian pharmacy | http://www.canadian-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | ... Posted by: skelaxin on October 4, 2004 09:38 AMYou may find it interesting to check out the sites about adipex | adipex | http://www.adipex-top-pharmacy.net/ | foreign pharmacy | foreign pharmacy | http://www.foreign-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | buspar | buspar | http://www.buspar-top-pharmacy.net/ | poker | poker | http://www.poker-top-casino.net/ | soma | soma | http://www.soma-top-pharmacy.net/ | Seroquel | Seroquel | http://www.Seroquel-top-pharmacy.net/ | Weight Loss Pills | Weight Loss Pills | http://www.Weight-Loss-Pills-top-pharmacy.net/ | famvir | famvir | http://www.famvir-top-pharmacy.net/ | pharmacy | pharmacy | http://www.pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | alprazolam | alprazolam | http://www.alprazolam-top-pharmacy.net/ | vioxx | vioxx | http://www.vioxx-top-pharmacy.net/ | adipex p | adipex p | http://www.adipex-p-top-pharmacy.net/ | canadian pharmacy | canadian pharmacy | http://www.canadian-pharmacy-top-pharmacy.net/ | ... Posted by: skelaxin on October 4, 2004 09:39 AMPost a Comment: |