From the Middle of Texas, Where the Center's to the Right


Farming

by Don Henry Ford Jr.

We leased out most of our farmland to a sharecropper this year. He's one of the best in the county; otherwise he wouldn't still be farming. But his kind are soon to be dinosaurs if current trends continue.

Quentin's dad still speaks English with a German accent, and his mother maintains the old ways. In Oma's home lunch is served at 12 pm and you'd best not be late. No jeans for her. Papa was raised during the time when being a sharecropper meant you didn't go to school in the spring for there was cotton to hoe, and fall picking often ran until a month or so after school resumed. For him, getting a higher education was not an option. But he made sure his sons got the chance.

Quentin is a big man; he stands 6' 4" tall and weighs around 300 pounds. He moves well for his size; signs of the great college football player he once was still exist, but the dream of playing pro ball went out the window when a commitment to the military sent him to the Mediterranean as a young navel officer. That's about the only time he has left his haunts.

After the stint in the military Quentin returned to what he knew. But what he knew no longer worked--to stay in business required farming more and more land with less and less manpower, more and better equipment, and greater yields. The seed he once planted no longer sufficed; a farmer had to use new and improved varieties. And a wide array of chemicals became a necessity.

The freedom to plant what you wanted when you wanted eroded--oh you could do it all right. But if you did, you went broke. Farmers learned to rely on government subsidies for their survival--the cost of raising a crop often exceeded the value of that crop, and these handouts represented the profit. To qualify, you had to do what they told you: plant what they said, when they said, how they said.

When conforming to the needs of the government didn't alter Quentin's ways, conforming to the rules necessary to get crop insurance did. Without it, a few consecutive crop failures would put him out of business. Crop failures are a given in Texas. Sometimes it rains, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes when it does rain, it rains too much or at the wrong time. Early freezes, no freeze at all, hail, pestilence, crop disease: many things await the man who puts a seed in the ground and hopes it will multiply.

And when you do make a crop, chances are good everyone else did also so the price of the farmer's product is likely to be bad.

Take this year's cotton crop as an example.

First Quentin had to register with the government to plant cotton--the only way you can get assistance is if you comply with the rules and regulations for bowl worm control.

We had good early moisture. Quentin plowed multiple times to make a good seedbed out of the otherwise tight black clay soil. He fertilized before planting with anhydrous ammonia. And he put out a pre-emergence herbicide, but this works only on certain kinds of weeds.

The seed he planted was genetically altered to make it resistant to Roundup, a herbicide that kills just about everything it touches, everything aside from the Roundup resistant plant that emerges from this special seed. But this seed probably cost him about ten times what normal cottonseed costs.

After planting it rained--hard--way too hard. About twenty acres flooded and remained under water long enough to kill the seed. And about another hundred acres of land crusted over. The seed could not break through and Quentin had to replant. With more of that expensive seed. Then it rained again. The low spots in the field were lost for the year. The rest received a new dose of weed seed carried in by the floodwater. Muddy fields prevented him from cultivating, but he did manage to get through the field one time before the plants got too tall.

Then it rained. And rained some more. The plants grew too fast and Quentin had to apply growth retardant so the plants wouldn't get too tall for the cotton strippers. He also had an outbreak of boll weevils and pesky weeds to deal with. He hired an airplane and an insane pilot to apply these products. Several times.

Roundup deals with the weeds, but there's a catch. Round-up is the name brand product. Until a few years ago it was under a patent and extremely expensive. After the patent expired, an identical product was created and sold by a competitor. But Quentin can't use this cheaper brand. The company that sells him this genetically altered seed is owned by the same people that make and sell Round-up. Monsanto. And they require you to use their name-brand product. The insurance company is in on the deal as well. Without proof that you bought and used this outrageously priced herbicide, you have no crop coverage. We are talking about four of five times as much money per gallon and many, many gallons.

Quentin hired contract strippers to harvest his crop. These contractors travel from field to field and state to state harvesting crops. When they arrived to strip Quentin's cotton, it lacked a couple of weeks being totally ripe. But storms in the gulf loomed. So Quentin sprayed defoliant on the cotton and settled for what was ready. In retrospect he did the right thing. The crop yielded over two bales to the acre in spite of the flooded out sections and the loss of twenty percent of the bolls too green and immature to pick.

It began raining again as soon as he finished removing the cotton modules from the field. Those that waited for a full yield lost a lot of cotton to the water.

By the time Quentin was done, a bumper crop in the panhandle of Texas and in China had driven the price of cotton down to the point that this miracle he pulled off--producing a crop in far less than optimal conditions--did nothing more than break even. Meaning he and we made nothing. Zero.

The government stepped in and made crop deficiency payments. So Quentin netted about a $20,000 profit and we got $10,000, every stinking cent worth in the form of a government handout because Quentin was a good old boy, and filled out all the forms, and did everything the way he was told and maybe kissed the right ass.

I'm sure those big corporations that sold him those chemicals and that expensive seed did well.

You'd think farmers would resist going along with this kind of thing, but those that have survived know they must. I don't know a single cotton farmer in this county that dared to try to raise a crop this year without being part of the program. The same goes for those that raise corn or milo.

Damn it.

The day of the independent farmer is dead and gone. It's no different for those that raise chickens or turkeys. A few corporations own all the slaughterhouses and the distribution networks. Cattle all end up in the same hands, regardless of who raised them. Fortunately for us, a Texan sits in the white house so meat is high. So is oil. Imagine that. And it may just be a coincidence, but if one does a little snooping you might find that the boys sitting in the capital are heavily invested in companies like ConAgra, Monsanto, Cargill, and a few others and that they are all doing very well, thanks to all of you that need to eat.

Quentin has been hard at it, getting ready for another crop. His sons though have watched what their dad endures and moved on. One is a commodities trader in California; the other manages an athletic wear store in a Dallas shopping mall. No way in hell they are going to waste their life on the farm. So when Quentin retires, maybe some corporation will hire his Mexican hands and continue farming.

It's sad to see farming go the way of the buffalo, but if what this article (courtesy of cousin Phil) says, we can't make it here anymore.

Sometimes I shake my head and wonder how things got this way.


Don December 23, 2004 - 5:40pm

as older relatives stopped operating their farms and ranches, saying they made more money leasing it to deer hunters. The source of all the money in this country comes from something you can hold in your hand or touch. If we don't grow anything or make anything, the only money left will be in the bank accounts and investments of the wealthy. Not even Wal-Mart can survive as a business if there are no customers with money to spend.

Phil December 23, 2004 - 7:57pm

When I say Quentin netted $20,000, I failed to mention that he did not figure his own time into expenses. Nor replacement costs of equipment that will wear out.

And while my father cleared $10,000, he risked around $30,000 in expenses doing so and could have lost money had not a crop been made. Property taxes will get most of the profit he made.

From the perspective of a land owner with a large investment in land, this makes for a poor business venture.

I know all of this has to be weighed with global considerations. These other countries need to make a living as well. But when we are forced to compete on equal terms with countries that do not mind exploiting their own labor force with slave-like conditions, it becomes very difficult to compete in any business and provide a decent living to our own workers.

These corporations I speak of are global. Their goal is to make money and they don't care where they make it.

Don December 24, 2004 - 8:44am

Those are story I hear everyday from My SO. The state of agriculture in NA is sad. I often argue with my GF over how to maintain a decent agricultural activity in north america. She maintain this beleif that agricultue could return to it's goden age. She do not like to see her productor becoming more and more buisness manager and less the worker of the land they used to be. There is two way they can save their industry, by exploiting local nich and individualize the product, or by going straight into highly mechanical highly technologic farming. And clearly the monsanto and other would prefer the second.

Here we are already seeing the diversification. People go Biologic, they choose rare crop , exploit local advantage to produce thing with a value-added. For example here I buy my vegetable from a network of bio producer, who sell and distribute direct to the customer, from the producer, without passing by the grocery store. I can tell you I pay less for my vegetable than those who go buy traditional one at the grocery store.

I've seen many farmer commit suicide after loosing their land because of the recent struggle. It is very sad that it comes to that. Those people are from the old guard, they only want to live in peace working on their land. These people loose all their dream, their culture, their way of living in problem taking place in place they never heard before . The world has invaded their bubble and it won't retreat soon.

Mathieu December 24, 2004 - 9:48am

NATIONAL | December 26, 2004

Big Farms Reap Two Harvests With Subsidies a Bumper Crop

To some people, the nation's price support system has never made less sense.

By TIMOTHY EGAN   (NYT)   News

Article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/26/national/26farm.html?ex=1261717200&en=367e541d718481de&ei=
5090&partner=rssuserland

Graphic: Farm Income

artappraiser December 26, 2004 - 5:44pm

http://www.cargill.com/worldwide/index.htm

List of countries in which Cargill operates:

Countries A-Z

Argentina

El Salvador

Malaysia

South Africa

Australia

Finland

Mexico

Spain

Austria

France

Morocco

Sweden

Belgium

Germany

Netherlands

Switzerland

Bolivia

Greece

Nicaragua

Tanzania

Brazil

Guatemala

Nigeria

Thailand

Bulgaria

Honduras

Pakistan

Turkey

Canada

Hungary

Paraguay

Ukraine

Chile

India

Peru

United Kingdom

China

Indonesia

Philippines

United States of America

Colombia

Ireland

Poland

Venezuela

Costa Rica

Italy

Portugal

Viet Nam

Côte d'Ivoire

Japan

Republic of Korea

Zimbabwe

Denmark

Kazakhstan

Romania  

Dominican Republic

Kenya

Russian Federation  

Egypt

Lithuania

Singapore  

Don December 24, 2004 - 8:50am

"If it's raining, they complain; if the wind is blowing too much, they complain," Mr. Thacker said. "It just seems like they're never happy."

One could write a doctorate thesis on farmer's obcession with weather. The "why" is obvious , but the repercussion in every day life can be quite complex ;)

Mathieu December 26, 2004 - 6:00pm

Mr. Miller, who is struggling to run his family farm on his own, says that big farms will line their subsidy payroll with family members who have minimal involvement.

"Typically, you get 10 relatives who all get the payments, but maybe for 6 of them, the only time they come out to the farm is for Christmas," Mr. Miller said.

Reminded me of no-show construction jobs in NYC, the Mafia and the labor unions! If the well runs dry there, maybe it's time to try the lucrative farm subsidy circuit? :-)

More seriously, it's a good article, don't you think? Brings up lots of interesting points in a small space. A recommended read for all, especially those not as knowledgeable as Don.

artappraiser December 26, 2004 - 6:52pm

So many people passed all the construction years delivering the same load of sand again and again ...

No wonder why it's the most expensive ugly useless toilet bowl in human history:

Mathieu December 26, 2004 - 7:08pm

but many small farmers resent having to take money from the government. But almost without fail, they do. I mean if a dollar is laying on the ground, are you going to pick it up?

The issue is complicated and is not limited to agriculture alone. How do we compete with countries willing to exploit the labor of their own people?

I often critisize my government. But the truth is, many other governments and their elite are harder on their citizens. We the people of the United States have had a long protacted fight with our own wealthy elite to get decent working conditions and resonable pay for workers.

Now corporations based in the US have become international in nature and go where they can get the best deal. This is good for consumers; we get products cheaper than we can make them here. The corporations make great profits.

But I can't help but wonder if there is not a way to use our influence to leverage other countries to treat their workers better rather than join in on the expoitation.

And what will become of us when we can no longer produce anything?

All of this has caused me to rethink the free-trade issue.

Don December 27, 2004 - 8:55am

I do not know enough to argue about "free-trade" agricultural policy.  I do know, however, that as long as their are local farmer's markets, I'll be damned if giving any to supermarkets.  It's something we can all do to help our local farmers.  Even if the supermarkets buy food from local producers, much of your money goes to middle and transit men.  The people who care for the soil and crops deserve as much of the cut as possible.

In the larger scheme of things, it seems to me that you can't have a strong local community if the community is sending all of its dollars elsewhere, because the end of that process is a dependent, politically weak community.  Try to make sure your dollars stay as close to home as possible, for as long as possible.  Supporting local farmers is a good way to start.  If we refused to opt for convenient and cheap food, farmers wouldn't have to take as much money from the government.  It's a shame that they have to take any at all.  

Everytime you write about farming, Don, I want to tell you to read some Wendell Berry.  The guy lives in Kentucky, he's a novelist, poet, and farmer.  You should pick up latest collection of essays, Citizenship Papers, it has a couple of essays on the war on terror/ 9-11, and a whole lot about farming and agriculture.  Pick it up sometime and you can thank me later.

anthonyking December 30, 2004 - 4:58am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.