BERGER: The fact is that there are 100 nuclear weapons that were not produced by North Korea as a result of that deal. What they got was a few million barrels of oil. It seems to me 100 nuclear weapons, a few million barrels of oil, that's not a bad deal.
And I must say, for some people in the administration, I'm beginning to think that blaming Clinton is a substitute for thinking."
There it is folks: 100 nukes or a few million barrels of oil?
Posted by Sean-Paul @ 01/13/2003 12:11 AM
| TrackBack
Comments:
I believe they are thinking but not about what is important to America, only themselves. If anything goes wrong...blame Clinton's penis.
Posted by: Les Dabney on January 13, 2003 08:48 AM
Of course it is a good deal -- but it wasn't the deal Clinton made!! This is insane. The US coverage of this whole thing is so far removed from reality it's insane.
Posted by: DavidByron on January 13, 2003 01:05 PM
Ummm...Not sure I get the issue here...it's certainly a success that NK didnt mass produce a 100 nukes, but its certainly a failure that NK cannot be contained. Of course, finger pointing is what this and any other Administration likes to do, but it's an inherently Western/American trait: we dont want to find a solution to a problem, we want to find someone responsible for mistake and then blame.
