Harrassment Attorneys
Q: The fact that both are so stupid, yet are lawyers, must say something
for the profession.
Looking who's calling me stupid? This is quite laughable!
tell that to the people who SEF and I have helped, who've been screwed on
gear deals or needed referrals to attorneys in their own areas. I've helped
over a dozen people from RMMG alone
A: I hope you advised their attorneys to research the body of evidence that such a case would be constructed out of, and to decide for themselves what the merits of the damage claims would be prior to initiating legal action. Starting baseless or frivilous actions is itself harrassment--if there's been a heated personal exchange, particularly, the evidence could easily support an argument that the lawsuit or charges themselves represent "delegated" or "hired" harrassment by person using their financial resources simply to win the argument. If you or the attorneys have only seen one side of it, they might simply be setting up their client for a successful countersuit. Which might open said attorneys to a suit for negligence, if not malpractice. I know there are attorneys salivating at the chance to set precident in electronic media cases, but they might be well advised to remember that precident is set when you *lose*, too